Brandeis Inv. Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a shipowner's duty to pay maintenance and cure continues until the seaman reaches the point of maximum medical recovery
• “Summary judgment is appropriate if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact’ and ‘the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.’ ” (quoting CR 56(c))
• “[I]f the Ramirez v. Winter Blues No. 3:20-cv-00002-SLG-DMS shipowner wishes to terminate paying maintenance and cure, the shipowner could move for an expedited trial under CR 42(b
• \Summary judgment is appropriate if 'there is no genuine issue as to any material fact' and 'the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter oflaw.\' (quoting CR 56(c))
• adopting the approach of district courts in the Ninth Circuit
• adopting the approach of district courts in the Ninth Circuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).