Skip to main content

Brand v. State

Citations

  • 941 So. 2d 318
  • 2006 WL 1121156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a district court may, in its discretion, exclude impeachment evidence that a party did not produce during discovery when it should have otherwise been produced
  • recognizing that a district court may, in its discretion, exclude impeachment evidence that a party did not produce during discovery when it should have otherwise been produced
  • introduction of boxes of cold and allergy medicine purchased by defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.