Brand v. Seider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• strict liability and breach of warranty claims against oral surgeon with respect to dental implants
• patient’s claim against psychologist for breach of confidentiality is subject to MHSA’s procedural requirements
• “[D]ismissal is not required by the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Butler v. Killoran
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-06-15· cited 30×
• Henderson v. Laser Spine Institute LLC
  D. Maine· 2011-09-28· cited 16×
• D.S. v. Spurwink Services, Inc.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2013-03-21· cited 13×
• White v. Fleet Bank of Maine
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-10-25· cited 11×
• Ann Salerno v. Spectrum Medical Group, P.A.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2019-08-20· cited 9×
• Faulkingham v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL
  D. Maine· 2004-12-22· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Humphers v. First Interstate Bank
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-03-06· cited 87×
• Tighe v. Ginsberg
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-04-14· cited 50×
• Dutil v. Burns
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1996-03-14· cited 49×
• Musk v. Nelson
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-09-29· cited 47×
• Town of Arundel v. Swain
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1977-06-08· cited 35×
• Michaud v. Northern Maine Medical Center
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-11-02· cited 34×
• Dougherty v. Oliviero
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-04-02· cited 31×
• Humphers v. First Interstate Bank
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-06-06· cited 24×
• Hunter v. Totman
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1951-04-24· cited 24×
• The Merchants National Bank v. Bernice I. Morriss
  First Circuit· 1959-07-31· cited 11×