· 12/9/2013
Brand v. Newjersey
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 800
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 606
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3347
- 571 U.S. 1101
- 2013 WL 5775351
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8947
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Holding that ALJs are not qualified to determine the significance of objective medical findings and must rely on expert opinion
- holding that the ALJ erred by evaluating medical evidence of “significant, new, and potentially decisive findings” himself “[i]nstead of consulting a physician”
- Holding that ALJs are not qualified to determine the significance of objective medical findings and must rely on expert opinion
- holding that the ALJ erred by evaluating medical evidence of “significant, new, and potentially decisive findings” himself “[i]nstead of consulting a physician”
- holding that the ALJ erred by evaluating medical evidence of “significant, new, and potentially decisive findings” himself “[i]nstead of consulting a physician”
- holding that an ALJ is not qualified to determine the significance of objective medical evidence and must rely on expert opinions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.