Brand v. Mazda Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘There is no duty to warn of dangers actually known to the user of a product, regardless of whether the duty rests in negligence ... or on strict liability.’”
• first citing Haynes v. Williams , 88 F.3d 898 , 900 n.4 (10th Cir. 1996) ; then citing United States v. Spedalieri , 910 F.2d 707 , 709 n.2 (10th Cir. 1990) ; then citing Morris v. State of Kan. Dep't of Revenue , 849 F.Supp. 1421 , 1428 (D. Kan. 1994

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).