Skip to main content
· 12/4/1992

Brand v. ELLIOTT ON BEHALF OF ELLIOTT

Citations

  • 610 So. 2d 37
  • 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that full hearing contemplates opportunity to be heard and present evidence
  • reversing final order granting permanent injunction because trial court failed to afford the parties a “full hearing” including the opportunity to present evidence
  • reversing final injunction because circuit court had refused to consider respondent’s evidence
  • reversing order granting injunctive relief where court announced it did not have time to conduct evidentiary hearing, because argument of counsel alone does not constitute evidence from which court can determine propriety of granting injunctive relief
  • “In the absence of a clear stipulation of counsel, argument of counsel alone does not constitute evidence from which the trial court can determine the propriety, vel non, of granting injunctive relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.