Branco Peres Citrus, S.A. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an AFA rate based on a transaction-specific margin was supported by substantial evidence
• upholding use of AFA because Commerce found that respondent possessed necessary sales and cost data at outset of review, but failed to retain such data despite notice that it might be required
• “Commerce was justified in its use of facts available by virtue of Plaintiffs cost data not having been provided. Indeed, a party’s failure to provide requested information is sufficient grounds for the use of facts available.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).