Branch v. Horner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “before” condition of the property was unencumbered by the original easement in accord with Florida contract principles, rather than Florida abandonment common law
• holding that the “before” condition of the property was unencumbered by the original easement in accord with Florida contract principles, rather than Florida abandonment common law
• “[T]he ‘before’ condition of the property . . . was the unencumbered fee simple[ ] Plaintiffs would have enjoyed . . . absent the taking.”
• “[T]he ‘before’ condition of the property . . . was the unencumbered fee simple[] Plaintiffs would have enjoyed . . . absent the taking.”
• “[T]he ‘before’ condition of the property . . . was the unencumbered fee simple[ ] Plaintiffs would have enjoyed . . . absent the taking.”
• “[T]he ‘before’ condition of the property . . . was the unencumbered fee simple[] Plaintiffs would have enjoyed . . . absent the taking.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).