Branch v. Guilderland Central School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the recent Supreme Court decision in Morgan curtails the use of the continuing violations doctrine, at least in Title VII cases
• holding that plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to establish causation in a retaliation claim against his supervisor when one of two employees who had filed a sexual harassment claim against him recanted and alleged that the filing of the claim was his supervisor’s idea
• discussing Morgan and finding retaliation claims timely where complaint alleged “a ‘policy' or ‘custom” ’ and thus provided “a permissible and appropriate basis for invocation of the continuing violations doctrine”
• “the continuing violations doctrine . . . allows a plaintiff ‘to bring suit challenging all conduct that was part of a continuing violation, even conduct that occurred outside the limitations period.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).