Branch v. Cherry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding PMA controlling relative to operative policy terms, including a “modern” separation-of- insureds clause, materially identical to those presently in issue
• finding PMA controlling relative to operative policy terms, including a “modern” separation-of- insureds clause, materially identical to those presently in issue
• “We conclude that the severability clause does not exclude [the non-employer insured seeking coverage] from the employee injury exclusion provision.”
• “The Pennsylvania Supreme Court squarely rejected Aetna’s position that the employee injury exclusion provision in the policy . . . operated to exclude coverage for employees only when those employees are employed by the insured seeking coverage[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).