Braintree Electric Light Department v. Department of Energy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that data from 1973 and 1974 “retain[ed] its importance in the 1980 market” and was protected under Exemption 4
• “[All information concerning a competitor’s pricing mechanism becomes helpful” or “vital information,” including inventory balances and information that would allow competitor’s “to learn a company’s capacity for expansion and cost of overhead”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).