Brainard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defendant was apparently satisfied with his sentence at the time it was entered as he did not appeal from it as was his right under [OCGA § 42-8-64], . . . This being so, he will not be heard to complain at this late date that the fine was excessive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dean v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-11-26· cited 48×
• Latham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-02-17· cited 16×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-05-13· cited 8×
• Boone v. State Ex Rel. Carter
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-12-01· cited 7×
• Carver v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-11-27· cited 2×
• Ardeneaux v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-03-13· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fuentes v. Shevin
  Supreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
• Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 1,797×
• North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1975-01-22· cited 795×
• Brainard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-09-10· cited 1×