· 1/15/1827
Brahan v. Debrell
Citations
- 1 Stew. 14
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]his court agrees with the Lion Raisins that the implied-in-fact contract theory no longer serves as a basis of recovery for bid protest actions”
- “Cases from this court have held that a contractor cannot seek bid preparation and proposal costs based upon a solicitation and award that have been cancelled.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.