Skip to main content

Bragg v. State

Citations

  • 740 S.W.2d 574
  • 1987 Tex. App. LEXIS 8759
  • 1987 WL 3503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding exceptions that were in separate subchapter from offense were neither “a necessary part of the definition nor description of the offense” and “it [would be] unreasonable to expect an indictment to include negations of [numerous] situations to which the offense does not apply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Cohen, Dunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.