· 7/1/1871
Bragg v. Burleigh
Citations
- 61 Me. 444
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the court may review the entire record to ascertain if any evidence supports the trial court’s subject-matter jurisdiction
- declaring that the addendum “was not before the trial court and is not before this Court” because “Vernco did not make an offer of proof of the [addendum] to the trial court and the [addendum] was not admitted into evidence but is merely appended to Vern-co’s brief’
- “When an assignor of a cause of action has not retained some right or interest in the cause of action, the assignor is barred from bringing suit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bakrows, Daneorth, Dickerson, Kent, Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.