Skip to main content
· 7/1/1871

Bragg v. Burleigh

Citations

  • 61 Me. 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the court may review the entire record to ascertain if any evidence supports the trial court’s subject-matter jurisdiction
  • declaring that the addendum “was not before the trial court and is not before this Court” because “Vernco did not make an offer of proof of the [addendum] to the trial court and the [addendum] was not admitted into evidence but is merely appended to Vern-co’s brief’
  • “When an assignor of a cause of action has not retained some right or interest in the cause of action, the assignor is barred from bringing suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bakrows, Daneorth, Dickerson, Kent, Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.