Brady v. UN. COMP. BD. of REV.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he fact that [the] claimant had difficulties in arranging for the taking of his psychologist’s testimony [did] not compel a conclusion that such evidence was not available”
• in order for the representative admissions exception to the hearsay rule to apply, the statement must be made against the interest of the party
• expert testimony required to establish that mental disorder constituted good cause for actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).