Brady v. Top Ships Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a lead plaintiff group of three members is a “size that courts have generally found likely to be cohesive”
• noting that “‘[o]ne of the principal legislative purposes of the PSLRA was to prevent 7 lawyer-driven litigation’”
• explaining that allowing “unrelated investors to join together” could lead to the type of “lawyer-driven litigation” that the PSLRA aims to prevent (citation omitted)
• describing aggregation of a lead plaintiff group as a “threshold issue”
• “Courts have correctly found that the PSLRA evidences a strong presumption in favor of approving a properly-selected lead plaintiff's decisions as to counsel selection and counsel retention.”
• “Courts have correctly found that the PSLRA evidences a strong presumption in favor of approving a properly-selected lead plaintiff’s decision as to counsel selection and counsel retention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo
  Supreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
• John E. Johnson and H/w Ann Marie Johnson v. The Celotex Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1990-03-20· cited 459×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1992-03-27· cited 168×
• In Re Olsten Corp. Securities Litig.
  E.D. New York· 1998-05-04· cited 132×
• Varghese v. China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2008-12-10· cited 102×
• Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. LaBranche & Co.
  S.D. New York· 2004-05-27· cited 89×
• In re Donnkenny Inc. Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 1997-04-02· cited 79×
• Khunt v. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 2015-05-01· cited 63×
• In re Fuwei Films Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2008-01-24· cited 54×
• Jacobs Ex Rel. Jacobs v. Castillo
  S.D. New York· 2009-04-23· cited 37×
• Glauser v. EVCI Career Colleges Holding Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2006-05-09· cited 28×
• Victor v. Argent Classic Convertible Arbitrage Fund L.P.
  Second Circuit· 2010-10-14· cited 18×