Brady v. Livingood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “stray” racial epithet directed towards plaintiffs .co-worker after an altercation did not constitute direct evidence
• ruling that, in the case of a branded drug, “state law may require a manufacturer to at least seek FDA approval for the addition of a new warning” without being pre-empted
• explaining that a covered employee must “commence an action under the CAA by requesting counseling not later than 180 days after the alleged discriminatory action”
• noting that “direct evidence does not include stray remarks in the workplace”
• assessing racial discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”)
• assessing racial discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).