Brady v. Human Resource Institute of Norfolk, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the discretionary function exception does not apply “where the Government is aware of a specific risk of harm, and eliminating the danger would not implicate policy but would involve only garden- variety remedial measures”
• although “any challenge to the validity or ‘plausibility’ of the religious reason” was barred by the First Amendment, plaintiff was free to offer evidence that similarly situated younger employees had not been terminated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).