Brady v. Flint

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact that allocation was negotiated by the parties militated in favor of affirming reliance on that allocation
• use of allocated sale price to value real property was affirmed where “no facts” before the , BTA indicated an “improper” allocation that would “distort the true value of the subject property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).