Brady v. Dunlop Tire Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing issue of whether risk was “open and obvious” from issue of whether plaintiff had “actual knowledge of the hazard”
• distinguishing issue of whether risk was \open and obvious\ from issue of whether plaintiff had \actual knowledge of the hazard\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lara v. Delta International Machinery Corp.
  E.D. New York· 2016-03-31· cited 29×
• Burke v. Spartanics Ltd.
  Second Circuit· 2001-06-04· cited 19×
• Stalker v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-03-12· cited 16×
• Wick v. WABASH HOLDING CORP.
  W.D. New York· 2011-03-14· cited 6×
• Oliver v. Tanning Bed, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-04-11· cited 6×
• Bruker v. Fischbein
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-12-16· cited 2×
• Unnamed case
  Second Circuit· 2001-06-04

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Liriano v. Hobart Corp.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1998-08-31· cited 258×
• Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1992-03-31· cited 148×
• Merritt v. Raven Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-04-20· cited 16×
• Village of Groton v. Tokheim Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-03-03· cited 11×
• Steinbarth v. Otis Elevator Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-02-16· cited 9×