Brady v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Texas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The court has been unable to locate a case ... in which unsworn, unverified interrogatory answers proffered by a nonmovant have been considered competent summary judgment evidence.”
• “To constitute competent summary judgment evidence . . ., the answers must satisfy the other requirements of Rule 56. Courts have considered ‘verified pleadings’ or sworn statements in support of summary judgment . . . .” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).