Bradshaw v. Story

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confirming that section 2255 motion is proper remedy for attacking the legality of the judgment and sentence
• affirming dismissal of § 2241 petition, where petitioner argued that § 2255 was an inadequate remedy, citing sentencing court’s denial of his previous § 2255 petitions as evidence of bias
• “Failure to obtain relief under 2255 does not establish that the remedy so provided is either inadequate or ineffective.”
• “A petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 attacks the execution of a sentence rather than its validity. . .”
• “A statute is effective upon the date of its enactment unless an express provision states otherwise.” (quotation omitted)
• “A 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition . . . must be filed in the district that imposed the sentence.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).