Skip to main content

Bradshaw v. State

Citations

  • 40 S.W.3d 655
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 963
  • 2001 WL 120054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that appellate court must hear merits of appeal because judgment of guilt of crime of possession of marijuana was not independent of trial court’s ruling on motion to suppress evidence of marijuana found at Bradshaw’s house
  • concluding that appellate court must hear merits of appeal because judgment of guilt of crime of possession of marijuana was not independent of trial court's ruling on motion to suppress evidence of marijuana found at Bradshaw's house
  • concluding that appellate court must hear merits of appeal because judgment of guilt of crime of possession of marijuana was not independent of trial court’s ruling on motion to suppress evidence of marijuana found at Bradshaw’s house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone, Duncan, Dial

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.