Bradshaw v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that drug paraphernalia contained in a nontransparent bottle was not in plain view in a constructive possession case
• noting that drugs contained in a non-transparent envelope will not be considered to be in plain view
• noting that drugs contained in a nontransparent envelope will not be considered to be in plain view

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Duncan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-02· cited 26×
• State v. Burrows
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-06· cited 11×
• Andrews v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-14· cited 8×
• De La Cruz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-10· cited 6×
• J.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-05· cited 5×
• Beverly Enterprises v. Collingsworth
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-21· cited 2×
• Rodgers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-30· cited 1×
• Barroso v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-08· cited 1×
• JM v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-05
• S. S., A Child v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-17
• Stevens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-11

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-03-03· cited 180×
• Frank v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-05-23· cited 141×
• Wale v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-04-29· cited 65×
• Muwwakil v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-28· cited 23×
• Chappell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-16· cited 9×
• Cordle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-18· cited 4×
• Rodriguez-Ramos v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 4×