Utah Supreme Court· 9/30/1983
Bradshaw v. Burningham
Citations
- 671 P.2d 196
- 1983 Utah LEXIS 1172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The agreement does not discharge the existing claim; it is discharged by the substituted performance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham, Hall, Stewart, Oaks, Howe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Golden Key Realty, Inc. v. MantasUtah Supreme Court· 1985-03-29· cited 58×
- Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-08-12· cited 10×
- Horman v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-08-11· cited 6×
- Tebbs, Smith & Associates v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court· 1986-09-10· cited 4×
- Real Estate Value Co. v. USAir, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1997-09-30· cited 4×
- Wade v. Utah Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1985-05-06· cited 2×
- Magleby v. SchnibbeUtah Supreme Court· 2024-12-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.