Skip to main content
· 10/6/2010

Bradshaw v. Alpha Packaging, Inc.

Citations

  • 379 S.W.3d 536
  • 2010 Ark. App. 659
  • 2010 Ark. App. LEXIS 703

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the TCPA allows a court to waive the motion filing deadline where \good cause\ exists
  • holding that lawyer’s statements were not commercial speech because they were aimed at the City of Galveston, which was plaintiff’s potential business partner not the lawyer’s
  • holding that by mentioning the timeliness of appeal, the trial court impliedly ruled that there was good cause for defendant’s failure to file his motion on time as required under the TCPA
  • noting that an appellate court reviews de novo a trial court's determination of whether the TCPA applied
  • recognizing attorney right to petition on behalf of clients and also attorney right to freedom of speech on behalf of clients in applying Texas anti-SLAPP law
  • explaining that under the Restatement (Second

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abramson, Agree, Gladwin, Glover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.