Skip to main content
· 3/19/1890

Bradley v. Towanda Township

Citations

  • 133 Pa. 371
  • 20 A. 1060
  • 1890 Pa. LEXIS 912

Syllabus

<p>A record showing a verdict for plaintiff in 1867, with a question of law l’eser'ved, a rule for a new trial granted thereafter, and judgment entered in 1868 in favor of defendant, non obstante veredicto, on the question reserved, it was not error in the court below to discharge a rule granted, on motion of plaintiff in 1890, to show cause why the judgment for the defendant should not be vacated and the rule for a new trial reinstated, although the question reserved and facts upon which it arose did not appear of record.</p>

Judges: McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Pee, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.