Skip to main content
· 5/11/1956

Bradley v. Swift & Company

Citations

  • 93 S.E.2d 364
  • 93 Ga. App. 842
  • 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • being occupied with other business does not mean party was fraudulently induced to sign
  • being occupied with other business does not mean party was fraudulently induced to sign
  • wherein there was no evidence that the opposing party committed any actual fraud on the guarantor from whom he was trying to collect a debt, and the guarantor admitted that he did not read the guaranty before signing it because he was occupied with his other business at the time
  • wherein there was no evidence that the opposing party committed any actual fraud on the guarantor from whom he was trying to collect a debt, and the guarantor admitted that he did not read the guaranty before signing it because he was occupied with his other business at the time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carlisle, Gardner, Townsend

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.