Bradley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• It is a fundamental tenet of due process that a person accused of a crime has a right to attempt to obtain exculpatory evidence.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• St. John v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-03-21· cited 18×
• State v. Ward
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2001-02-09· cited 5×
• Moberg v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2007-01-26· cited 4×
• Carter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2015-08-07· cited 1×
• Gudjonnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-08-12
• Stamper v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2017-09-08

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Erickson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 129×
• Lauderdale v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 116×
• Municipality of Anchorage v. Serrano
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-08-06· cited 65×
• Doyle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-09-10· cited 49×
• Cooley v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-08-06· cited 33×
• Van Cleve v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-09-03· cited 18×
• Sullivan v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-05-05· cited 15×