Skip to main content
· 11/3/1993

Bradley v. Ragheb

Citations

  • 633 A.2d 192
  • 429 Pa. Super. 616
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statute of limitations began to run when plaintiff had sufficient information to learn of potential misdiagnosis; fact that plaintiff may not have learned full consequences of timely diagnosis did not toll statute
  • in most cases, date injury is sustained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Wieand, Cirillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.