Bradley v. McLeod

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the same principle applies when party files a Rule 59.04 motion to alter or amend
• holding: a Rule 59 motion should not be used to raise new legal theories where motion for summary judgment is pending
• holding: a Rule 59 motion should not be used to raise new legal theories where motion for summary judgment is pending
• holding: a Rule 59 motion should not be used to raise new legal theories where motion for summary judgment is pending
• holding: a Rule 59 motion should not be used to raise new legal theories where motion for summary judgment is pending
• holding: a Rule 59 motion should not be used to raise new legal theories where motion for summary judgment is pending

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).