Skip to main content
· 2/25/2009

Bradley v. LaClair

Citations

  • 599 F. Supp. 2d 395
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14716
  • 2009 WL 483171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that New York’s “procedure for litigating Fourth Amendment claims” has been found “by the federal courts in this Circuit to be facially adequate”
  • adopting report and recommendation finding no good cause when petitioner’s “newly discovered evidence” was “available to him at the time of his arrest and at all times thereafter” with “due diligence”
  • no “good cause” where newly discovered evidence was available to petitioner with due diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David G. Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.