Bradley v. Govt. Employees Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• question of whether another insured tortfeasor was involved, thus precluding UM coverage, see Bayles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 483 So.2d 402 (Fla.1985)
• question of whether another insured tort-feasor was involved, thus precluding uninsured motorist coverage
• “In deciding whether the plaintiff-appellant was entitled to uninsured motorist coverage under the GEICO policy, the trial court, not the arbitrators, was required to determine whether the uninsured motorist policy applied to the case at hand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).