· 3/19/1987
Bradley v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
Citations
- 657 F. Supp. 197
- 42 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,910
- 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1768
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2040
- 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 708
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiffs negligence claim, asserting that defendant breached its duty by not instituting and following policies to prevent discriminatory conduct towards her, is barred by Workers Compensation Law
- employer’s retaliatory harassment of employee for filing an EEOC charge insufficient as a matter of law to support a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress because conduct must consist of more than insults, indignities, and annoyances
- individually named defendants not hable for interference with a contractual relationship where no allegation that any of them acted outside the scope of his or her authority as an agent of the employer
- Title VII plaintiff can sue supervisors in their representative capacities
- finding individual liability under Title VII
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kram
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.