Skip to main content
· 3/19/1987

Bradley v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Citations

  • 657 F. Supp. 197
  • 42 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,910
  • 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1768
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2040
  • 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 708

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiffs negligence claim, asserting that defendant breached its duty by not instituting and following policies to prevent discriminatory conduct towards her, is barred by Workers Compensation Law
  • employer’s retaliatory harassment of employee for filing an EEOC charge insufficient as a matter of law to support a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress because conduct must consist of more than insults, indignities, and annoyances
  • individually named defendants not hable for interference with a contractual relationship where no allegation that any of them acted outside the scope of his or her authority as an agent of the employer
  • Title VII plaintiff can sue supervisors in their representative capacities
  • finding individual liability under Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kram

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.