Skip to main content

Bradley v. Bradley

Citations

  • 2007 WY 117
  • 164 P.3d 537
  • 2007 Wyo. LEXIS 128
  • 2007 WL 2176033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the choice of law provision was valid when the parties’ owned real property in the state and planned to spend a considerable amount of time there when they entered into the agreement
  • applying analogous cases from Minnesota and Wyoming to interpret contracts since both states’ rules were similar
  • rejecting general statements that a choice of law provision is contrary to law
  • under both Wyoming and Minnesota laws, a “contract is construed as a whole and, if possible, all parts of the contract are harmonized”
  • “In resolving conflicts over what state’s law applies to a particular problem, we have adopted Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Voigt, Golden, Hill, Kite, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.