Bradley Shideler v. Michael Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an ALJ’s credibility determination need not be perfect to survive judicial review
• finding that the ALJ need not specify which of the claimant’s statements were not sufficiently supported by the substantial record evidence (citing Jens v. Barnhart, 347 F.3d 209, 213–14 (7th Cir. 2003))
• acknowledging that “the ALJ’s decision was not perfect” but nonetheless holding that because the ALJ adequately connected her adverse credibility determination to the record, any shortcomings in her decision did not warrant reversal
• “We do not reweigh evidence or substitute our own judgment for that of the ALJ[.]”
• \... an ALJ's credibility findings need not specify which statements were not credible.\
• “[A]n ALJ’s credibility findings need not specify which statements were not credible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).