Bradley Real Estate Trust v. Dolan Associates Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under Illinois law, “a statement of future intention cannot generally be the basis of a claim of fraud because alleged misrepresentations must be statements of present or preexisting facts, and not statements of future intent or conduct”
• affirming trial court’s rejection of equitable estoppel because party could not demonstrate misrepresentation of present or preexisting facts, or the existence of a scheme to defraud
• ‘If the language is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence is admissible to determine the parties’ intent and the interpretation of the language is a question of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).