Bradley Dyer v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that the threshold inquiry to determine standing is whether the documents sought are public judicial documents available to the public via the common law right of access and -5- J-S05011-22 concluding that the party seeking the documents must be aggrieved to have standing
• “[Kessler] appeals pro se from the [trial court’s] order denying her motion to intervene and request to view sealed wiretap records in [Inmate’s] completed criminal case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).