Skip to main content

Bradford v. State

Citations

  • 460 So. 2d 926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving admissibility of odontologist’s expert testimony similar to bite-mark analysis (citing Bundy v. State, 455 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1984))
  • approving admissibility of odontologist’s expert testimony similar to bite-mark analysis (citing Bundy v. State, 455 So.2d 330 (Fla.1984))
  • version of events related by the defense must be believed if circumstances do not show that version to be false
  • \We are not allowed to retry a case or reweigh the conflicting evidence submitted to the jury.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schoonover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.