Skip to main content

Bradford v. State

Citations

  • 618 S.E.2d 709
  • 274 Ga. App. 659
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 2453
  • 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming admission of lay testimony identifying defendant as the person on videotape of store robbery as the basis of his distinctive body movements
  • permitting identification when witnesses identified masked perpetrator based on familiarity with defendant’s “quirky body movements”
  • affirming admission of lay testimony identifying defendant as the person on videotape of store robbery on the basis of his distinctive body movements
  • affirming admission of lay testimony identifying defendant as the person on videotape of store robbery as the basis of his distinctive body movements
  • permitting identification when witnesses identified masked perpetrator based on familiarity with defendant’s “quirky body movements”
  • affirming admission of testimony by store owner' and former employer identifying defendant as the person on videotape of store robbery on the basis of his distinctive body movements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Ruffin, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.