Bradford-Scott Data Corporation, Inc. v. Physician Computer Network, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[9 U.S.C.] § 16(b)(1) upsets the principal holding of Moses Cone”
• endorsing automatic divestiture rule, reasoning that “[cjontinuation of proceedings in the district court largely defeats the point of the appeal and creates a risk of inconsistent handling of the case by two tribunals”
• endorsing automatic divestiture rule, reasoning that “[c]ontinuation of proceedings in the district court largely defeats the point of the appeal and creates a risk of inconsistent handling of the case by two tribunals”
• “[Preparation for trial must be suspended until the court of appeals renders a decision.”
• “Arbitration clauses reflect the parties’ preference for non-judicial dispute resolution, which may be faster and cheaper.”
• “Continuation of proceedings in the district court largely defeats the point of the appeal and creates a risk of inconsistent handling of the case by two tribunals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).