Skip to main content
· 3/1/1955

Bradford Novelty Co. v. Technomatic, Inc.

Citations

  • 142 Conn. 166
  • 112 A.2d 214
  • 1955 Conn. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that conduct of plaintiff clearly indicated that it acquiesced in defendant’s delay and would not require rigid adherence to dates specified for completion of performance
  • by repeatedly acquiescing in previous delays, obligee waived its right to insist on strict compliance with contractual provisions as to time of performance
  • ‘‘[t]he plaintiff, by its conduct, waived its right to strict compliance with the provisions of the contract’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldwin, O'Sullivan, Wynne, Daly, Alcorn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.