Bradford Novelty Co. v. Technomatic, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that conduct of plaintiff clearly indicated that it acquiesced in defendant’s delay and would not require rigid adherence to dates specified for completion of performance
• by repeatedly acquiescing in previous delays, obligee waived its right to insist on strict compliance with contractual provisions as to time of performance
• ‘‘[t]he plaintiff, by its conduct, waived its right to strict compliance with the provisions of the contract’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Multi-Service Contractors, Inc. v. Town of Vernon
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-06-19· cited 71×
• Multiplastics, Inc. v. Arch Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-04-16· cited 27×
• S.H.V.C., Inc. v. Roy
  Connecticut Superior Court· 1981-02-20· cited 20×
• Funaro v. Baisley
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-05-09· cited 12×
• Unnamed case
  D.C. Circuit· 1980-12-04· cited 8×
• R. A. Weaver & Associates, Inc. v. Haas & Haynie Corp.
  D.C. Circuit· 1980-12-04· cited 7×
• RBC Nice Bearings, Inc. v. SKF USA, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-10-08· cited 5×
• D.P. Technology Corp. v. Sherwood Tool, Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 1990-11-29· cited 3×
• Stetzer v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 2000-02-16· cited 2×
• RBC Nice Bearings, Inc. v. SKF USA, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-09-22
• Piascik v. Stone, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1973-06-15
• Reserve Realty, LLC v. Windemere Reserve, LLC
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-04-04

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Continental Copper & Steel Industries, Inc. v. Bloom
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-04-30· cited 6×
• Galasso v. Cowles
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1950-07-11· cited 3×