Brader v. Minute Muffler Installation, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the underlying objective of restitution is to prevent unjust enrichment by either party
• the underlying objective of restitution is to prevent unjust enrichment by either party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Seattle Professional Engineering Employees Ass'n v. Boeing Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-01-27· cited 85×
• Trotzer v. Vig
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-01-13· cited 18×
• Trotzer v. Vig
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-03-24· cited 14×
• SPEEA v. Boeing Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-01-27· cited 5×
• Tucker v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 417
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-04-14· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit District
  California Supreme Court· 1990-12-24· cited 64×
• Allianz Insurance v. Gagnon
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-10-04· cited 55×
• Schwartz v. Estate of Greenspun
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-09-28· cited 54×
• Greenwood v. Stevenson
  D. Rhode Island· 1980-10-20· cited 39×
• Dussault v. Seattle Public Schools
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-06-23· cited 13×
• Hiltpold v. T-Shirts Plus, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-09-15· cited 13×
• Cover v. Chicago Eye Shield Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 1943-06-12· cited 12×
• Glende Motor Co. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-08-21· cited 10×
• Hackney v. Sunset Beach Investments
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-04-20· cited 8×