Skip to main content
· 5/14/1998

Braddock v. Smith

Citations

  • 711 A.2d 835
  • 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 100
  • 1998 WL 240137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring a new hearing where claimant was not provided written notice, as required by regulation, of her rights and the procedures for a hearing
  • “It is a basic tenet of administrative law that an agency is bound to follow its own rules and regulations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steadman, Schwelb, Farrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.