Bradbury v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• letters that accused employee of \a lack of fidelity and honesty in her dealings with her employer\ were actionable per se
• letters that accused employee of \a lack of fidelity and honesty in her dealings with her employer\ were actionable per se
• letters that accused employee of \a lack of fidelity and honesty in her dealings with her employer\ were actionable per se
• letters that accused employee of \a lack of fidelity and honesty in her dealings with her employer\ were actionable per se
• “To charge an employee with dishonesty in his dealings with his employer is slanderous per se . . . .”
• $50,000 punitive damages award in libel per se case not excessive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).