Bradbury v. Gilford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “„[T]he thing sued for‟ in both actions was monetary damages arising out of the same set of facts.”
• “quality of person” exists where defendants were identical and were sued in the same capacity in both suits
• because “application for trial de novo was not filed by an attorney, its application was void ab initio”
• “This aspect of res judicata is commonly referred to as claim splitting.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).