Bradbury v. Blake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that law enforcement officer ‘ ‘with a significant amount of experience with child sex abuse cases may be qualified” to discuss grooming
• recognizing that law enforcement officer \with a significant amount of experience with child sex abuse cases may be qualified\ to discuss grooming
• holding that the phenomenon of grooming children for sexual molestation is an appropriate topic for expert testimony and noting that 10 circuits and 38 states have addressed grooming, with most reaching the same conclusion
• explaining that expert testimony regarding grooming behavior was useful to the jury and still involves matters beyond the understanding of the jury
• explaining that per Rule 702, expert testimony does not have to be based upon science at all
• noting that testimony about grooming in a child sexual assault case is useful to the jury because it is beyond the jury’s common knowledge and understanding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).