Bradbary v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the language granting an easement is clear, “‘[i]ntentions not expressed in the writing are deemed to have no existence’”
• stating that “[i]ntentions not expressed in the writing are deemed to have no existence and may not be shown by parol evidence”
• refusing to find ambiguity in a contract just because the terms as written “may work a hardship upon one of the parties”
• “[C]ourts will not give the contract a construction other than that which the plain language of the contract provides.”
• “The general rule is that contracts should be construed so as to give effect to the intention of the parties -”
• “Intentions not expressed in the writing are deemed to have no existence and may not be shown by parol evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).