Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “declin[ing] to read a ‘rule of proportionality’ into the [District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act]”
• presumption of delivery requires borrower to come forward with evidence to meet presumption, but does not shift burden of proof to borrower
• statutory and common law claims were related because they all required resolution of whether defendant’s sale of insurance to plaintiff was fraudulent
• borrower's testimony too incredible to rebut presumption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).